[En-Nut-Discussion] Bug #2826991

Matthias Ringwald mringwal at inf.ethz.ch
Fri Jul 31 10:22:28 CEST 2009


On 31.07.2009, at 10:10, Ole Reinhardt wrote:

>> msg.c
>> mutex.c
>> semaphore.c
>
> I'm using mutex.c quite often to model consumer / producer problems or
> to lock concurrent access to uarts or other ressources.

That's why I've implemented mutex and semaphore, loosely following  
POSXI standards. To be honest I found the Event API a bit misleading/ 
confusing... :)
I'm happy to help fixing bugs in these two. They are really only  
minimal wrappers around NutPostEvent/NutWaitEvent calls.

matthias





More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list