[En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut not running stable

[Erich]

the ethernut 3.0 rev has the dm9000ep on it, shouldnt be the problem there?

erich

Erich schrieb:
> doesnt work, anything else?
>
> Coleman Brumley schrieb:
>   
>> In 4.8.7, the RX stack size is 768:
>>
>> #define NUT_THREAD_NICRXSTACK   768
>>
>> So, where did the 384 come from?  
>>
>> Using this setting, the at91_emac doesn't exhibit this ping lockup problem,
>> so try increasing it to 768 and see if it works.  
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
>> [mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de] On Behalf Of Erich
>> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:14 AM
>> To: Ethernut User Chat (English)
>> Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut not running stable
>>
>> i tried everything, not solution so far, anything i can do?
>> erich
>>
>> Harald Kipp schrieb:
>>   
>>     
>>> On 17.11.2010 23:15, Ulrich Prinz wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Yes, that's what I said. If you start the httpd example and if you just 
>>>> request some http data while running your pings, it doesn't crash. If 
>>>> you don't request tcp or udp data, it crashes immediately.
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> Exactly this behavior could be observed here before increasing the stack
>>> of the NIC receiver thread. Looks weird, but a larger stack size fixes
>>> it, actually.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Harald
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>
>