[En-Nut-Discussion] qnuconf feature required
Ole Reinhardt
ole.reinhardt at embedded-it.de
Tue Jul 19 11:27:00 CEST 2011
Hi Harald,
> I think that the way Ole did it offers greater flexibility in the
> current state of the project and is easy to implement.
>
> In long term we may end up with too many Makedefs and would need an
> explicit configuration of certain compiler options. But this requires
> some more effort than just a new entry field.
I think Ulrichs idea is not that wrong. On linux you can give the
toolchain prefix directly as a parameter to make
example:
make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-whatever-eabi-
That solution would be very flexible.
We can still have the toolchain selectable by the Makefiles, but could
change the Makefiles to first check if the toolchain (CROSS_COMPILE)
parameter was given to make. Thus we would have both options available?
Bye,
Ole
--
Thermotemp GmbH, Embedded-IT
Embedded Hard-/ Software and Open Source Development,
Integration and Consulting
http://www.embedded-it.de
Geschäftsstelle Siegen - Steinstraße 67 - D-57072 Siegen -
tel +49 (0)271 5513597, +49 (0)271-73681 - fax +49 (0)271 736 97
Hauptsitz - Hademarscher Weg 7 - 13503 Berlin
Tel +49 (0)30 4315205 - Fax +49 (0)30 43665002
Geschäftsführer: Jörg Friedrichs, Ole Reinhardt
Handelsregister Berlin Charlottenburg HRB 45978 UstID DE 156329280
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list