[En-Nut-Discussion] branches/devnut_m3n: Status of device support

Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Wed Oct 19 10:45:00 CEST 2011

>>>>> "Henrik" == Henrik Maier <hmnews at proconx.com> writes:

    Henrik> On 18/10/2011 9:19 PM, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
    >> Why not go for the F407 and the STM32F4DISCOVERY. You get the stlink
    >> debugging/programming adapter, some devices on-board to test and all
    >> MCU pins brought out to connector pins.

    Henrik> Never considered the F407 before, thanks for the
    Henrik> suggestion. More memory and FPU are nice too have. But at the
    Henrik> end it will come down to part price and availability. The F207
    Henrik> are offered with smaller memory configurations and hence are
    Henrik> considerably cheaper.  The beauty of the STM32F line is that
    Henrik> they are all pin-compatible so one up- or downscale depending on
    Henrik> requirements.  If we keep the Nut/OS port flexible as well, the
    Henrik> whole range could be supported nicely.

For development, the F407 might be a good choice. Ample RAM so you can
upload only to RAM while developping. Debugging/programming on board, so
somehow self-contained. For the product you can then use a smaller device. 

Did you think about my PCC board proposal?

Uwe Bonnes                bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list