[En-Nut-Discussion] Which is the latest greatest branch

[Thiago A. Corrêa]

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Harald Kipp <harald.kipp at egnite.de> wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> On 26.10.2011 21:19, Ulrich Prinz wrote:
>> Just to be sure to have everything in:
>> What is the latest greatest Nut/OS in the repository?
>
> While the trunk was frozen, I applied all fixes to the 4.10 branch. A
> few days ago I synced the trunk with this branch, except Ole's autotools
> changes. They require directory moving and I do not have much experience
> with svn merge. I was afraid, that moving directories with merge may not
> work as expected. Still not sure, if I should apply Ole's commits manually.
>

Is the trunk still frozen? I probably didn't pay attention to those
mails. I've commited a few macro changes in avr32. Nothing that should
change behavior, it just makes it easier to suport other AVR32 SoCs.

>
>> upgrade all other architectures  to a working combination in devnut_stm32
>
> Great.
>
> Instead of dividing arch into arch/arm and arch/cm3, I propose to use
> arch/armv4t, arch/armv5t and arch/armv7_m. The first two should contain
> the ARM7TDMI and ARM9EJ-S architectures we currently have in arch/arm
> and the latter will take the Cortex-M4. Code, which is valid for all ARM
> architectures can be left in arch/arm.

What about borowing linux tree layout:
arm/boot
arm/include
arm/march-at91
arm/march-cortex
arm/march-s3c24xx



Kind Regards,
     Thiago A. Correa