[En-Nut-Discussion] Stellaris Licences, was: Re: Ethernut on TI's ...
phip at hb9etc.ch
Mon Oct 29 21:39:19 CET 2012
On 10/29/2012 09:33 PM, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>>>>>> "Philipp" == Philipp Burch <phip at hb9etc.ch> writes:
> Philipp> It seems rather unrelated to the StellarisWare package and is
> Philipp> tagged with revision "32" of 27 March 2009.
> Philipp> It could be possible to write a translator which generates a
> Philipp> CMSIS file from the StellarisWare header, so we could get
> Philipp> around this licensing issue. But besides being an annoying
> Philipp> task, this would simply be stupid as the files are readily
> Philipp> available...
> There was a TI license change somewhere in between. Before that change the
> files contained a disclaimer _not_ allowing to use the header in conjunction
> with BSDL like licenses. So forget about old revisison and use _only_ revisions
> after that license change.
it's not that I wanted to use old files/revisions. This is simply the
only CMSIS-like distribution I could find at all. Or am I missing something?
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion