[En-Nut-Discussion] Runtime library dependencies

[Uwe Bonnes]

>>>>> "Harald" == Harald Kipp <harald.kipp at egnite.de> writes:

    Harald> Hi Ole, On 28.09.2012 15:03, Ole Reinhardt wrote:

    >> Yes, I agree. We should try to keep it compatible. But in the next
    >> moment I'm thinking about other tools as well (Keil etc...) we don't
    >> have specific support for these tools yet. But it might be a good
    >> Idea to get in contact with these companies to get at least mentioned
    >> as supported OS. Unfortunately this will take some effort to make
    >> NutOS compatible with their tools but also might increase the user
    >> base.

    Harald> May I remind you, that I was recently looking for someone, who
    Harald> would have been able to respond to the request from
    Harald> STMicroelectronics regarding Nut/OS support for the STM32?

    Harald> http://lists.egnite.de/pipermail/en-nut-discussion/2012-August/013764.html

    Harald> Uwe was so kind to post a status to this list, but no one
    Harald> finally answered STM's request. Nut/OS marketing is really
    Harald> lousy. ;-)

Well, in my answer there were some question, mostly directed to Harald. And
how could anybody answer to STM if there was no address of the person at
STM? Even not in private mail...

Bye
-- 
Uwe Bonnes                bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------