[En-Nut-Discussion] Extra packet in ethernet packet

[Coleman Brumley]

> On at91sam7x platform I'm using nut/arch/arm/dev/atmel/at91_emac.c and
> it working well.

I just checked and this is what I'm using as well. Sorry for the false
alarm, I should've checked before replying. 

Coleman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de [mailto:en-nut-discussion-
> bounces at egnite.de] On Behalf Of Pawel
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 4:12 AM
> To: Ethernut User Chat (English)
> Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] Extra packet in ethernet packet
> 
> 
> 
> >>>>>> "Coleman" == Coleman Brumley <cbrumley at polarsoft.biz> writes:
> >     Coleman> Uwe, I've not looked to see if this was removed in the
latest
> >     Coleman> code base.
> >
> >     Coleman> I do not have SVN rights that I know of.
> >
> >     >> arch/arm/dev/atmel/at91sam7x_emac.c is marked obsolete and not
> >     >> referenced in our build system. Any reason not to remove this
file?
> >
> >     Coleman> Why is marked as obsolete? Has the driver been merged with
> a
> >     Coleman> unified driver or something?
> >
> > SVN has
> > nut/arch/arm/dev/atmel/at91_emac.c
> > nut/arch/arm/dev/atmel/at91sam7x_emac.c
> >
> > and the configuration only references "arm/dev/atmel/ih_at91emac.c"
> > with a
> > comment:
> > nut/conf/arch/arm.nut:-- Ethernet driver source. at91sam7x_emac.c will
> become obsolete.
> >
> > Can somebody of the arm people comment?
> In my opinion arch/arm/dev/atmel/at91sam7x_emac.c is not used and it is
> not needed.
> On at91sam7x platform I'm using nut/arch/arm/dev/atmel/at91_emac.c and
> it working well.
> 
> >>>    Does anyone resolved this problem?
> >>> Removing "sz++" is not enough to send packet with odd bytes number.
> 
>     Of course this is not true - my fault.
> After changes everything looks ok.
> 
> regards
> Pawel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion