[En-Nut-Discussion] Scheduling out of Interrupt sometimes take a timertick NAP

[Harald Kipp]

Hi Nathan,

On 09.03.2015 15:22, Nathan Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Harald Kipp <harald.kipp at egnite.de> wrote:
>> Btw. in
>> earlier releases this function was named NutEventPostAsync(), which IMHO
>> better reflects its behavior. This function is not limited to interrupt
>> routines.
> 
> As far as I can tell there is still a NutEventPostAsync() which is
> different from NutEventPostFromIrq();

This gives the lie to my explanations. I misconceived the inner working
of NutEventPostFromIrq(). It's not an external function but a macro and
therefore the volatile attribute is required.

Many thanks, Nathan. I vow to have a closer look next time, before
posting false statements.

Regards,

Harald