[En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut, UART HW Flowcontrol and maybe Bluetooth

[Lars Andersson]

Matthias,

I would like to say that your work is of most interest! Do you have any plans to start working with Nut/OS in your system ?
If you are planning to port your code into the NUT/OS I would be glad to help in any way.

Have you made your stack implementation from scratch or did you port from some other stack? Are you planning to implement more layers in the future? BNEP & PAN perhaps ? :-)

I think it would interesting to se if one can use the Nut/OS ppp stack ontop of your RFOMM layer. 

Regards,
Lars A Andersson

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Ringwald [mailto:mringwal at inf.ethz.ch]
Sent: den 9 december 2003 18:50
To: en-nut-discussion at egnite.de
Subject: [En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut,UART HW Flowcontrol and maybe
Bluetooth


Hi

first congratulation to ethernut as a mature, free, co-operative OS.
I'm quite impressed with the provided features and I'm trying
to use it instead of our self-written minimalistic
event-queue based dispatcher system on our ATmega128+Bluetooth nodes
called BTnodes ( www.btnode.ethz.ch )

we have a bluetooth stack that includes HCI and L2CAP implementation
and a partly implemented RFCOMM layer.

for the communication with the bt module, uart hardware handshake
is required at least on the incoming side.
today I added this to the uartavr.c driver.
I tested at 115200 running at CPU-FREQ=7372800

how fast (@cpu speed) do people use the uarts without handshake (@cpu 
speed) ?
is anybody interested in those changes?

Matthias Ringwald
ETH Zurich



_______________________________________________
En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion