[En-Nut-Discussion] Supporting Other Target Platforms
NGB
ngbmoreau at yahoo.com.au
Mon Feb 2 23:52:32 CET 2004
>
> In principle, yes. But unless you find a toolchain using 3.3 or 3.4 that
> isn't
> tagged "experimental", I'd recommend staying with 2.95.3. Especially if C++
> isn't needed but just C and assembler.
I'm pretty sure GCC 3.3 has been tagged stable for ARM, a quick check on the arm
linux malining list should confirm this.
Nic
-------------------------------------------------
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list