AW: [En-Nut-Discussion] 8019 IOCHRDY question
Oliver.Schulz at bong.de
Wed Jan 21 12:07:37 CET 2004
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Waschk,Kolja [mailto:enut at ixo.de]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2004 12:03
> An: en-nut-discussion at egnite.de
> Betreff: [En-Nut-Discussion] 8019 IOCHRDY question
> as reported earlier, ignoring the RTL8019AS' IOCHRDY may
> cause problems and
> actually does so under certain circumstances. Are there any
> about _which_ operations often cause IOCHRDY to be asserted
> for longer than
> usual? Writing to specific RTL8019AS registers or data
> transfer in general?
> Wouldn't it be reasonable to change the ATmega128 external memory
> wait state settings for those operations? Or does it occur
> especially in
> the "DMA" mode during packet data transfer, where lowering the access
> speed would impact network thoughput?
> On devices such as the 1.3F board (where upper 32K address space isn't
> occupied with SRAM) one may even use the ability of the m128
> to specify
> different wait state configuration for lower and upper part
> of external
> address space permanently.
> mr. kolja waschk - haubach-39 - 22765 hh - ger
> phone +49 40 889130-34 - fax -35 - e-mail s.a.
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion