[En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut 3.9.9 and NutDelay()

[Thiago A. Corrêa]

The compiler says it's implicitly declared when it can't find the
prototype for the functions. This means you are not including the
header files where they are declared.

As far as I know, it will then assume the function returns an int,
that could make the compiler generate wrong stack handling code!

On 12/15/05, Alexander Baranov <baranov at intech21.com> wrote:
> Hello, all
> Ethernut 3.9.9 just told me that NutDelay(), NutHeapAlloc, NutHeapAllocClear
> are implicitly declared. Nevertheless I see them in documentation and the
> are not noted as deprecated. Is it correct that they are not supported any
> more and I have to rewrite my old programs and libraries?
> Sorry if I ask the question which may have been answered several times...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Fischer" <fischermi at t-online.de>
> To: <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:09 PM
> Subject: [En-Nut-Discussion] NUTSetup: "Christmas gift"
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > here a little christmas gift to the ethernut community :-)
> >
> > The source for the windows application NUTSetup is now available too.
> >
> > http://www.usbdip.de/en/nutsetup/index.html
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>