[En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut 3.9.9 and NutDelay()

Alexander Baranov baranov at intech21.com
Fri Dec 16 15:42:18 CET 2005


Yes, I know. But the configurator was supposed to build the system so that
it should be defined in appropriate header.  I tried to find 'NutDelay' text
in whole Ethernut 3.9.9 folder and failed. Does it mean that  there is no
header including the NutDelay definition now? And don't I have this problem
with 3.9.8?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thiago A. Corrêa" <thiago.correa at gmail.com>
To: "Ethernut User Chat (English)" <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut 3.9.9 and NutDelay()


> The compiler says it's implicitly declared when it can't find the
> prototype for the functions. This means you are not including the
> header files where they are declared.
>
> As far as I know, it will then assume the function returns an int,
> that could make the compiler generate wrong stack handling code!
>
> On 12/15/05, Alexander Baranov <baranov at intech21.com> wrote:
> > Hello, all
> > Ethernut 3.9.9 just told me that NutDelay(), NutHeapAlloc,
NutHeapAllocClear
> > are implicitly declared. Nevertheless I see them in documentation and
the
> > are not noted as deprecated. Is it correct that they are not supported
any
> > more and I have to rewrite my old programs and libraries?
> > Sorry if I ask the question which may have been answered several
times...
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael Fischer" <fischermi at t-online.de>
> > To: <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:09 PM
> > Subject: [En-Nut-Discussion] NUTSetup: "Christmas gift"
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > here a little christmas gift to the ethernut community :-)
> > >
> > > The source for the windows application NUTSetup is now available too.
> > >
> > > http://www.usbdip.de/en/nutsetup/index.html
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> >
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>
>





More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list