[En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut 3.9.9 and NutDelay()

[Thiago A. Corrêa]

Oh, so this is while compiling ethernut itself, I thought it was some
application....

I don't have these warnings at all. I did notice that the configurator
picked up the settings from registry and was using the wrong include
path ( 3.9.8's folder ), so I had to change it prior to compiling.
Maybe they moved it to some different header in 3.9.9 but you are
including 3.9.8 headers (?)


On 12/16/05, Alexander Baranov <baranov at intech21.com> wrote:
> Yes, I know. But the configurator was supposed to build the system so that
> it should be defined in appropriate header.  I tried to find 'NutDelay' text
> in whole Ethernut 3.9.9 folder and failed. Does it mean that  there is no
> header including the NutDelay definition now? And don't I have this problem
> with 3.9.8?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thiago A. Corrêa" <thiago.correa at gmail.com>
> To: "Ethernut User Chat (English)" <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 8:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut 3.9.9 and NutDelay()
>
>
> > The compiler says it's implicitly declared when it can't find the
> > prototype for the functions. This means you are not including the
> > header files where they are declared.
> >
> > As far as I know, it will then assume the function returns an int,
> > that could make the compiler generate wrong stack handling code!
> >
> > On 12/15/05, Alexander Baranov <baranov at intech21.com> wrote:
> > > Hello, all
> > > Ethernut 3.9.9 just told me that NutDelay(), NutHeapAlloc,
> NutHeapAllocClear
> > > are implicitly declared. Nevertheless I see them in documentation and
> the
> > > are not noted as deprecated. Is it correct that they are not supported
> any
> > > more and I have to rewrite my old programs and libraries?
> > > Sorry if I ask the question which may have been answered several
> times...
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael Fischer" <fischermi at t-online.de>
> > > To: <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:09 PM
> > > Subject: [En-Nut-Discussion] NUTSetup: "Christmas gift"
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > here a little christmas gift to the ethernut community :-)
> > > >
> > > > The source for the windows application NUTSetup is now available too.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.usbdip.de/en/nutsetup/index.html
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > > > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > > > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>