AW: [En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut 3.9.9 and NutDelay()

[Ernst Stippl]

Hi!

I unzipped the file ethernut-3.9.9.exe in an "ethernut.3.9.9" directory and
started Nutconf from there.
When Nutconf started, (at least on my Win/XP machine) it opens the "File
select" dialog and shows the "conf" directory from 3.9.8 !!!!!(which is also
on may machine).
Be sure to select the right "conf" directory (from 3.9.9) and then set the
attributes for nutconf and build Nut/OS etc.

regards
Ernst

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
[mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de] Im Auftrag von Thiago A. Corrêa
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 15:51
An: Ethernut User Chat (English)
Betreff: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut 3.9.9 and NutDelay()

Oh, so this is while compiling ethernut itself, I thought it was some
application....

I don't have these warnings at all. I did notice that the configurator
picked up the settings from registry and was using the wrong include path (
3.9.8's folder ), so I had to change it prior to compiling.
Maybe they moved it to some different header in 3.9.9 but you are including
3.9.8 headers (?)


On 12/16/05, Alexander Baranov <baranov at intech21.com> wrote:
> Yes, I know. But the configurator was supposed to build the system so 
> that it should be defined in appropriate header.  I tried to find 
> 'NutDelay' text in whole Ethernut 3.9.9 folder and failed. Does it 
> mean that  there is no header including the NutDelay definition now? 
> And don't I have this problem with 3.9.8?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thiago A. Corrêa" <thiago.correa at gmail.com>
> To: "Ethernut User Chat (English)" <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 8:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] Ethernut 3.9.9 and NutDelay()
>
>
> > The compiler says it's implicitly declared when it can't find the 
> > prototype for the functions. This means you are not including the 
> > header files where they are declared.
> >
> > As far as I know, it will then assume the function returns an int, 
> > that could make the compiler generate wrong stack handling code!
> >
> > On 12/15/05, Alexander Baranov <baranov at intech21.com> wrote:
> > > Hello, all
> > > Ethernut 3.9.9 just told me that NutDelay(), NutHeapAlloc,
> NutHeapAllocClear
> > > are implicitly declared. Nevertheless I see them in documentation 
> > > and
> the
> > > are not noted as deprecated. Is it correct that they are not 
> > > supported
> any
> > > more and I have to rewrite my old programs and libraries?
> > > Sorry if I ask the question which may have been answered several
> times...
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael Fischer" <fischermi at t-online.de>
> > > To: <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:09 PM
> > > Subject: [En-Nut-Discussion] NUTSetup: "Christmas gift"
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > here a little christmas gift to the ethernut community :-)
> > > >
> > > > The source for the windows application NUTSetup is now available
too.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.usbdip.de/en/nutsetup/index.html
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > > > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > > > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>
_______________________________________________
En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion