[En-Nut-Discussion] Lost Configuration Options in AT91?
Thiago A. Corrêa
thiago.correa at gmail.com
Sat Nov 12 21:54:38 CET 2011
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Ulrich Prinz
<ulrich.prinz at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I see there some trouble rising. Some of the options are chip specific
> and so the result will be a large list of greyy out options. Something
> like the CPU lists.
> But I see that the user will search there first for configuring his
> No idea of how to make this a bit clearer. May be we could add an option
> in the scripts that hide instead of deactivate and option.
It could be done, shouldn't be hard, but we would have the same
problem Kconfig has: features might go unnoticed because they depend
on some other thing.
Thiago A. Correa
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion