[En-Nut-Discussion] Lost Configuration Options in AT91?

[Thiago A. Corrêa]

Hi,

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Ulrich Prinz
<ulrich.prinz at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I see there some trouble rising. Some of the options are chip specific
> and so the result will be a large list of greyy out options. Something
> like the CPU lists.
> But I see that the user will search there first for configuring his
> USART...
>
> No idea of how to make this a bit clearer. May be we could add an option
> in the scripts that hide instead of deactivate and option.
>

It could be done, shouldn't be hard, but we would have the same
problem Kconfig has: features might go unnoticed because they depend
on some other thing.

Kind Regards,
    Thiago A. Correa