[En-Nut-Discussion] Where does the LICENSE_ST_GUIDANCE_ONLY require from
harald.kipp at egnite.de
Sat Jan 26 17:41:40 CET 2013
On 26.01.2013 12:31, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Henrik> If the tags remain omitted in the .conf files then I suggest to
> Henrik> add a #error directive to the STM32 headers which checks whether
> Henrik> the tags are set and if not, give a hint that the user has to
> Henrik> add those and by doing so accept the license. For example:
> Henrik> #ifndef LICENSE_MCD_ST_LIBERTY #error You must add the tag
> Henrik> LICENSE_MCD_ST_LIBERTY to the .conf file and by doing so accept
> Henrik> the special license conditions of ST Microelectronics #endif
> Sounds like a good idea. Will you go for a patch or should I?
I'm not familiar with STM32 builds and have a question. What exactly
fails, if the user doesn't enable LICENSE_MCD_ST_LIBERTY? Building
Nut/OS libraries for the STM32 in general or just building the application?
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion