[En-Nut-Discussion] Switching to GIT
hmnews at proconx.com
Thu Sep 26 02:14:44 CEST 2013
I don't have a strong point for Mercurial over Git and will vote for a
move to any of the two. I think the developers who work most with the
code and contribute most should decide.
A couple of years ago I personally chose Mercurial for my internal
projects as back then Windows support was stronger compared to Git which
used to have some rough edges on Windows. This was years ago however and
is not the case any more today.
On 26/09/2013 12:36 AM, Harald Kipp wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
> On 25.09.2013 16:01, Henrik Maier wrote:
>> I personally would vote for Mercurial which works very well on Windows,
>> my main platform.
> I'm mainly working on Windows too and use Git occasionally for some time
> now without problems. As with Subversion, I prefer the command line
> however. For those, who prefer a GUI, there is
> which btw. also supports Mercurial. But let's face it: The majority of
> developers are more familiar with Git than with Mercurial.
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion